PDA

View Full Version : Betting out of position


cerberi
24-05-2007, 02:10 PM
Every Hold 'em strategy guide talks about the importance of positional advantage. The standard thinking is that the player who acts last has more information than his opponents, so he'll have a better sense of where he stands in a hand and can, therefore, make better decisions. There's no doubt that this is true, but it's important to understand that the power that comes with position is often granted to the late-position player by the early-position player.

To see what I mean, consider a pretty typical No-Limit hold 'em hand. Say that I'm in the big blind with 7s-8s - a nice, flop-worthy hand. The player on the button raises to three times the big blind and I decide to call. Many players would check the flop under almost any circumstances. But, by checking, you give control to the late-position player. He can bet whether or not he has a hand, putting you in a tough spot if you don't get a piece of the flop.

In a hand like this, I believe it's best to look at the flop and ask, "Is it likely that these cards helped my opponent?" Once I have an answer to that question, I can decide how to proceed.

If the flop is Ah-Kd-9c, I'd probably just check and fold to a bet, as my opponent was likely raising with big cards and caught a piece of the flop. However, if the flop is 9c-5h-2d, I'd probably be more skeptical. I know that in Hold 'em, two unpaired hole cards will fail to make a pair on the flop about 66 percent of the time, and this seems to be a flop that the pre-flop raiser might have missed.

If I suspect my opponent didn't connect, I'm going to take the initiative and bet out about half the size of the pot. Betting here with my gutshot draw offers several advantages. First, I might take the pot down right here, and I'm always happy when a semi-bluff forces a fold. But even if I get a call from my opponent, I've forced him to react. That gives me a chance to pick up a read. If my opponent seems uneasy, I might continue with my semi-bluff on the turn and try again to pick up the pot. Or, if I feel my opponent is strong, I can check and fold to any bet on the turn if I fail to make my hand.

Stabbing at pots when out of position can be very lucrative. In tournaments, I'll open-raise out of position fairly frequently because I think there's a lot of power in being the first one to fire at the pot on the flop. I pick up a lot of small pots that way.

As you work on your Hold 'em game, remember that you don't have to give the advantage in the hand to the player in late position. Look for opportunities to bet out and seize the initiative.

Gus Hansen

GusHansenJr
24-05-2007, 03:07 PM
Gus Hansen is my favourite poker player. I try to play like him for the most of the time. Any 2 hole cards, anytime and against anyone :D

cerberi
24-05-2007, 05:58 PM
Definately a great player,exciting to watch and theres a lot to be learnt from his style of play.

armbrust
24-05-2007, 08:33 PM
Thats supossed to be top secret strategyˇˇˇ

Porkrind
29-05-2007, 01:30 AM
:p I have played against Cerberi several times and I can tell you he is a tough player. Once you identify this type of player though they can be trapped quite easily turning a small pot into a monster.

NookieMonster
30-06-2007, 02:10 PM
The secret to the "any 2 cards" style of play is knowing how to play after the flop. If you don't have a feel for the table and your opponents, it can kill you. Gus Hanson and Daniel Negraneau are the best at "after flop" play, and that is part of why they are 2 of my fave players.

Hansen_Fan
07-07-2007, 11:49 PM
I guess you can tell by my name who I'm a fan of - I'd love to be able to play like this after the flop. I have been trying it lately, with varying degrees of success. Hopefully it'll improve as my experience does.

NookieMonster
09-07-2007, 02:36 PM
As Porkrind said, it is easy to get trapped with this style of play...especially if one of your opponents has gotten a read on what you are doing. But that doesn't mean it can't be a lucrative style of play. Again, reading the table and your opponents is what makes the difference. When you play "any 2 cards" your game is actually playing your opponents and not your cards. A good opponent will just wait for the right hand and eat your stack. Keep at it and let us know how it goes!

Porkrind
11-07-2007, 08:14 AM
Being able to chip away at the players to your left with those marginal hands is in my opinion the only way to be a successful tournament player. Getting a good read on them is the key to the tactic. That way when they suddenly wake up and play back at you there is no question than to fold. Unless of course you finally have AA or KK............................

dayafterday
14-07-2007, 05:59 PM
i hate cash games... its so boring :( im more of a tourny guy... so if someone wants to play some tournies just msg me and we can play 1 or 2 games.

NookieMonster
15-07-2007, 12:31 PM
If you want excitement in a cash game, play micro limit. To some people, it's a waste of time playing .05/.10 or .10/.25, but let me tell you it can be a blast. Sort of like a freeroll but with money! And it's not unusual to see pots at $30 or more. On more than one occassion, I have won pots in excess of $50 on .05/.10 tables. Give it a try!

pokerworld-home
18-07-2007, 08:15 PM
Playing any two cards is ok but as already said, you must know what to do with them after the flop. Experienced Players might get a read on you quiet fast and you could break on your continue bets...

Anyways, I wouldn't recommend to play any two cards, especially not at cash games and not in the beginning of your session.

Observe the players, table, betting patterns and once you read them well enough you can start playing them instead of the cards :)

Cesgeogue
02-06-2009, 10:39 AM
The default one is a bit too far back; I can barely read the HUD. How close is realistic? I mean, how much of the instrument panel does a pilot see when he sits in a Ka?Oh. And someone please tell me how to do loops in my Ka. Ive gotten better. Im capable of landing 2 out of 10 times now.

investgator
27-06-2009, 12:44 PM
Hi guys,

I started playing Badugi and despite hardly any player having a real clue how to play that came, one thing I spotted repeatedly:

Say player A has a made hand after the first draw and keeps firing against 2 villains until the 3rd draw. Villains keep discarding 1 card.

Now, even if he is in position, he will check in the end with his made hand.

I wonder why, since so many players are doing that.

Reason I could imagine:
1 If you have something like a J-low, you might get raised or check-raised by a player who thinks he made a better hand or you only get called by hands that might have you beat.
2 You wont get any value from hands that only have a 3 card hand, so betting is useless, because your opponent will simply fold.

Why I dont agree with these lines of thought:
1 Players tend to bet for value - it is a limit game after all, so if someone made a nice hand and I am in position and it is checked to me, I would still bet it because I am most likely ahead.
2 Screw value after the 3rd draw from hands you have beat. Betting there will let you bluff more often, if you dont have a hand after the 2nd draw but you are standing pat and firing. If you continue betting, people have to call you down lighter or if they dont you have plenty of opportunity to outplay them.

Of course another reason for this pattern could be that nobody has a clue.

Your thought?

Porkrind
27-06-2009, 04:07 PM
One tactic that a whole lot of draw players use these days is to draw one check call all the way to the last street.
Then if they have position on the last card they will throw out a big bet.
Amazing how often that works. Especially in Razz and Stud Hi/Lo.